267 as ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on January 22, 2013. We would like to show you a description here but the site won't allow us. 2705 FERC: Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 Your note is for you and will not be shared with anyone. . Promoting hydropower development at nonpowered dams and closed loop pumped storage projects. Updated bill text was published as of Reported by Senate Committee. This page was last edited on 11 July 2018, at 12:04. H.R. Promoting small hydroelectric power projects. If youve visited a bill page on GovTrack.us recently, you may have noticed a new study guide tab located just below the bill title. Our mission is to empower every American with the tools to understand and impact Congress. The legislation also requires the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to study how to further improve the regulatory process. 3) Amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) to increase from 5,000 to 10,000 kilowatts the size of small hydroelectric power projects which the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) may exempt from its license requirements. However, because FERC recovers 100 percent of its costs through user fees, any change in the agencys costs (which are controlled through annual appropriation acts) would be offset by an equal change in fees that the commission charges, resulting in no net change in federal spending. Mrs. McMorris Rodgers (for herself, Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (2013; 113th Congress S. 545) - GovTrack.us Congress Bills S. 545 (113th) S. 545 (113 th ): Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 Overview Summary Cosponsors Details Text Study Guide A bill to improve hydropower, and for other purposes. Promoting small hydroelectric power projects, Sec. Our Table of Popular Names is organized alphabetically by popular name. Were looking for feedback from educators about how GovTrack can be used and improved for your classroom. Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013, S. 545, 113th Cong.. {{cite web See Changes . Please join our advisory group to let us know what more we can do. Youve cast your vote. 7. Follow us on social media: Last updated Oct 11, 2018. According to the bill's proponents, current regulations are unwieldy and represent a significant hurdle to creating more hydropower plants. FERC authority to extend preliminary permit periods, Sec. On January 13, 2013, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for H.R. Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 - (Sec. Your note is for you and will not be shared with anyone. |author=113th Congress (2013) 267) is a bill that was introduced into the United States House of Representatives of the 113th United States Congress on January 15, 2013. Help us develop the tools to bring real-time legislative data into the classroom. (, Identical Bill Help us develop the tools to bring real-time legislative data into the classroom. on May 8, 2013, First Small Hydro Project in Colorado Moves Forward Thanks to Regulatory Efficiency Act 267 would have no significant net impact on the federal budget. We love educating Americans about how their government works too! SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. As ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on January 22, 2013. Read Updated Text 2013. on Nov 22, 2013. not later than 3 years after the date of implementation of the final pilot project testing a 2-year process, hold a final workshop to solicit public comment on the effectiveness of each tested 2-year process. A committee has voted to issue a report to the full chamber recommending that the bill be considered further. (More Info). Promoting hydropower development at nonpowered dams and closed loop pumped storage projects. 267 would amend current law to allow FERC to extend certain permits related to hydroelectric facilities and exempt small hydroelectric facilities with a generating capacity of 10 megawatts or less from FERCs licensing requirements. Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (2013 - H.R. 267) describes the outcomes of the pilot projects; describes the public comments from the final workshop on the effectiveness of each tested 2-year process; and. Our mission is to empower every American with the tools to understand and impact Congress. |accessdate=June 27, 2023 Hide All The Ads With a Yearly Membership, Let Freedom Sing Act would let national anthem be sung inside Capitol Building, after Capitol, As Oakland As seek move to Las Vegas, Moneyball Act would require pro baseball teams compensate, Combating International Islamophobia Act would create Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia. Youre more than a vote, so support GovTrack today with a tip of any amount: Or keep using GovTrack for free! (a) SHORT TITLE.This Act may be cited as the ''Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013''. Congress.gov, the official portal of the United States Congress. Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 Notice of Workshop View Vote Your note is for you and will not be shared with anyone. 5. Promoting conduit hydropower projects. Laws acquire popular names as they make their way through Congress. The Bill would raise that amount to 10,000 kilowatts, facilitating the speed at which smaller hydropower projects could be built. Please help us make GovTrack better address the needs of educators by joining our advisory group. H.R. 267, the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 Youve cast your vote. 267 would authorize FERC to carry out pilot projects to demonstrate the potential of generating hydroelectric power at nonpowered dams and water-storage facilities. On January 31, 2013, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for H.R. Data via the congress project. Section 5 of the Federal Power Act(16 U.S.C. History books, newspapers, and other sources use the popular name to refer to these laws. 2705), as amended, is further amended by striking subsection (a) of such section 30 and inserting subsection (b) of such section 30. Search, browse and learn about the Federal Register. Government Publishing Office The existing rules mean that it takes about five years for hydropower projects to get approval, according to hydropower industry sources. Only about 1 in 4 bills are reported out of committee. Launched in 2004, GovTrack helps everyone learn about and track the activities of the United States Congress. The Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (H.R. (expand s the category of hydroelectric facilities that qualify for an exemption, promotes conduit hydropower projects, and requires FERC to examine the feasibility of a two-year licensing process), Bureau The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. If you can, please take a few minutes to help us improve GovTrack for users like you. Finally, CBO estimates that any increased costs to DOE to prepare the study that would be required under H.R. Waives license requirements for any conduit hydroelectric facility that: (1) uses for electric power generation only the hydroelectric potential of a non-federally owned conduit, (2) has a maximum installed capacity of 5 megawatts, and (3) is not currently licensed or exempted from license requirements. Sec. Mr. Matheson, Federal Register 2.0 is the unofficial daily publication for rules, proposed rules, and notices of Federal agencies and organizations, as well as executive orders and other presidential documents. Short title; table of contents. H.R. 493 (2013) (HREA). In Section 7 of the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act (HREA) of 2013 (P.L. Sec. on Aug 9, 2013. We are also still on Instagram at @govtrack.us posting 60-second video summaries of legislation in Congress. 7) Directs the Secretary of Energy (DOE) to study: (1) the technical flexibility that existing pumped storage facilities can provide to support intermittent renewable electric energy generation, including the potential for such facilities to be upgraded or retrofitted with advanced commercially available technology; and (2) the technical potential of existing pumped storage facilities and new advanced pumped storage facilities to provide grid reliability benefits. The Bill would alter those regulations to make it easier for smaller plants to get approval quickly. Would you like to join our advisory group to work with us on the future of GovTrack? To improve hydropower, and for other purposes. By joining our advisory group, you can help us make GovTrack more useful and engaging to young voters like you. Jun 20, 2023. House Report 113-6 - HYDROPOWER REGULATORY EFFICIENCY ACT OF 2013 - GovInfo 113-23, H.R. 5892 (112th). Did you know we post one-minute videos summarizing new legislation in Congress? President Obama signed the Act into law on August 9, 2013. Nor will a full-text search of the Code necessarily reveal where all the pieces have been scattered. Opportunities for Energy Development in Water Conduits: A Report The Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 ( H.R. Enacting S. 545 would not affect direct spending or revenues; therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures do not apply. In the intervening time subsequent legislation may have amended or repealed the provisions below. Data via the congress project. Visit us on Mastodon 267, the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013, Privacy, Security, and Copyright Policies. Visit us on Mastodon 267, the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013, Privacy, Security, and Copyright Policies. Public Law 113 - 23 - Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 267, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hydropower_Regulatory_Efficiency_Act_of_2013&oldid=1038791481, Renewable energy policy in the United States, Energy infrastructure in the United States, Articles with dead external links from August 2021, Articles with permanently dead external links, Wikipedia articles incorporating text from public domain works of the United States Government, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0. Any person, State, or municipality proposing to construct a qualifying conduit hydropower facility shall file with the Commission a notice of intent to construct such facility. |title=S. This activity took place on a related bill, H.R. (Co-sponsor) Text of H.R. 267 (113th): Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 [5], After passing in the House, the Bill was referred to the United States Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on February 14, 2013. The National Hydropower Association (NHA) conducted a study that concluded that "the United States could add approximately 60,000 MW of new hydropower capacity by 2025, potentially creating as many as 700,000 jobs in the process," according to the Committee Report released by the House Energy and Commerce Committee when it referred the Bill to the floor. This activity took place on a related bill, H.R. Hackers/journalists/researchers: See these open data sources. ) is amended by striking 5,000 and inserting 10,000. Federal Register :: Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 Under the Federal Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issues licenses and regulates hydroelectric facilities, regardless of size. Did you know we post one-minute videos summarizing new legislation in Congress? 16 USC 791a note. This page is sourced primarily from 267, the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013", Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (H.R. Passed House (Senate next), Identical Bill This report is by the Energy and Commerce Alert: For a better experience on Congress.gov, please enable JavaScript in your browser. 3. 267 would have no significant net impact on the federal budget. In addition, the bill would direct the Secretary of Energy to study the feasibility of generating hydroelectric power using water flowing through conduits or at facilities that store water. Updated bill text was published as of Reported by House Committee. By joining our advisory group, you can help us make GovTrack more useful and engaging to young voters like you. Section 6 of the Bill would direct the FERC to: Finally, Section 7 would direct the Department of Energy to study: Some environmental groups, such as American Rivers, support the bill because it primarily addresses only very small power plants, which are less disruptive to the environment than the much larger megadams many environmental groups oppose. However, because FERC recovers 100 percent of its costs through user fees, any change in the agencys costs (which are controlled through annual appropriation acts) would be offset by an equal change in fees that the commission charges, resulting in no net change in federal spending.
Does Stoughton Have School Today,
Where Was The Referee From,
Best Hotel In Rome, Italy For Sightseeing,
Christian Counselor Salary,
4a School Districts In Texas,
Articles H